Fast, Reliable & Affordable Web Services
Highlights
  • email marketing ...
  • content management ...
  • fastest VPS hosting ...
  • new SEO techniques ...
  • Online business drivers ...

advice

Choosing an IT Consultant

Consultants’ bios on the web, more often than not, approximate their CVs’ and whilst it’s necessary to see their relevant experience and skills, this approach rarely gives you an insight into their personality or the core beliefs that drive them.

If you decide to employ a consultancy it makes sense that you trust and respect them as professionals and understand what business philosophies and methods they will practice to save you money and increase your profits.

You are paying for the consultants’ time and experience and expertise to achieve these core objectives.

We always start our first meeting with the same question, what do you really want for your life?
…not just for the business, but your life, that could simply be more leisure time or more time to spend with your family and friends  or just time to pursue other interests?

Ask yourself how we can help the business to fit you and not you to fit the business.
We guarantee this will help you achieve your business goals and have the life/work balance that you desire.

Of course, you may wish to employ us purely to help with your business needs and take a less personal approach to the consultancy process, which is the often all that is required.

At Powered by Humans all of us are working professionals who have had our own businesses; collectively we have a vast depth of experience and an impressive skill set to help you meet your defined goals. If you take the time to read our individual bios’ this is self-evident.

Contact us for a free initial meeting.

We hope you enjoy reading our bios’ and you are welcome to contact any of us via email with any questions you may have.

Your website front page

If I had £1 for every of time that I’ve seen or reviewed a website that is ostensibly fine, but the front page is a disaster, then I’d have enough to buy a new car. Not an expensive car, but definitely a small hatchback.

Designing a website front page is a subtle blend of user needs and business goals. Most front pages forget one or the other and that leads to user confusion and a business that is not achieving the goals it has set out for its website; whether they be product purchases, engaging the user in relevant information or messages or generating sales leads.

We can help you to identify your business goals, your user’s needs and translate them to appropriate layout and design for your front page within the template design that has already been produced by your website design company.

An Apple a day?

Actually they seem to be selling a great deal more than that. I’ve been reading the recent (not so recent) news of Apple’s sales figures. See:

http://blogs.eweek.com/applewatch/content/corporate/apple_q3_2008_by_the_numbers.html

http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/07/21results.html

This is important for Colrosa as a company that undertakes software product development for our clients.

It seems that Apple has made a 49% increase in sales (units sold) in desktops and a 37% increase in portables from Q3 in 2007 to Q3 in 2008. These figures are staggering and have a potential impact on the sorts of decisions software developers make on their choice of development platform and delivery platform for their software applications.

This slightly older article (May 2008):

http://blogs.eweek.com/applewatch/content/channel/macs_defy_windows-gravity.html

relates that “Apple’s retail market share is 14 percent, and two-thirds for PCs costing $1,000 [in the US] or more”, and this was prior to Apple Q3 figures announced in July.

I haven’t been able to find any figures on SME, corporate and home use market share, which of course would greatly impact this issue:

If I am considering developing a software product, do I: develop for MS Windows only, MS Windows and MacOS X or indeed MacOS X only?

However, this:

http://www.tuaw.com/2008/08/26/forrester-apple-nearly-quadruples-enterprise-share/

and other articles indicate a 4.5% penetration into the business market (Aug 2008) in general, much lower than the overall market share. Not being a market analyst I can’t say if the business market, being late adopters, are likely to follow the general or home use trend. It seems to me though that (logically, but without proof) this increase may be in the SME market, where personal preference can be more important than corporate IT strategy.

Cross platform development greatly limits the technologies and languages that one might choose to develop with, yet commercially is making more and more sense.

This is still an open question and one that is swayed by the vertical market that you might be developing for. It pretty clear that an application aimed at graphic designers would be more profitable if cross platform. Perhaps something in the legal sector would not benefit at all. But, what about an application of ubiquitous use across both the SME and corporate market? Where would we draw the line?

What are the development options?

Please post a comment if you know differently!

  1. C++ (option 1) with a common interface library, e.g. QT
  2. C++ (option 2) with separate interface code
  3. Java – compile once and debug everywhere.
  4. scripting and GTK (I haven’t really looked in to this, but understand that this would be possible)

Choices would depend on the simplicity/complexity of the UI design and therefore its percentage of the build. For example if I were building a local file indexing engine (a la spotlight for the mac) with a half a dozen user settable preferences and an on/off button I would not need to worry about re-writing the UI. If, however, I was building a diagramming tool, then my first concern would the the common UI tools between platforms.

The other important factor to consider is the additional cost to developing cross platform. My experience of developing cross platform in Java is that it is about 10-15% more expensive (depending on various factors), than developing for one platform.

My last thought on the matter is this: Mac users often have less choice in applications and are usually prepared to pay for something that works well, simply and with grace; right or wrong this is why they went for the Mac and MacOS X in the fist place. I believe that users are often as concerned about their experience with an application as they are about the raw features and as often as not confuse the two: rating more usable applications as more effective in getting a job done.